Jailed offender complained about verdict online
A convicted gang leader has had her prison sentence increased after she posted videos on TikTok complaining about the original term handed to her. The woman, who was initially jailed for eight years, is now facing a ten-year sentence following a review of her case.
Court told she showed no remorse
The 26-year-old, who cannot be named for legal reasons, had been convicted for her role in an organised crime group involved in drug trafficking. Soon after she was sentenced, she recorded and shared multiple TikTok clips from prison, claiming the verdict was unfair and suggesting she would appeal. Prosecutors later used the footage to argue she had shown no remorse for her actions and was attempting to undermine confidence in the justice system.
Sentence extended to ten years
At a hearing this week, the court agreed to increase her sentence to ten years. Judges said her social media posts demonstrated a continued lack of responsibility and challenged the seriousness of her offences. They also cited her leadership role within the criminal organisation and the need to send a clear message to others.
Social media use highlighted in court
The original investigation had already uncovered evidence of the group using social media to promote a criminal lifestyle. Posts included displays of cash, designer clothing and luxury cars, all believed to be funded through illegal activity. In this case, the defendant’s videos were seen as further proof that she was continuing to glorify her actions even after conviction.
Reaction from the community
The sentence increase has been welcomed by members of the local community, many of whom had voiced concerns about gang-related activity in the area. Residents described the original posts as “tone-deaf” and “disrespectful” to victims of organised crime.
A warning for others
Speaking after the ruling, a Crown Prosecution Service spokesperson said the case served as a warning to others. “Posting on social media in a way that disrespects the court or encourages further offending can and will be taken into account,” they said. “This was a serious case involving organised criminal activity, and the court has rightly recognised that.”
The woman will now serve a minimum of five years before she is eligible for parole.
